Comparison
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Opus 5.5: Half the Price, Enough for Most
Same 1M context and 128K output. Sonnet costs $2 input to Opus's $4. Most tasks do not need the expensive one.
- Sonnet input
- $2/M
- Opus input
- $4/M
- Gap
- 50%
Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Opus 5.5 share the same 1-million-token context window, the same 128K maximum output, and the same tool calling and structured output capabilities.
Sonnet costs $2 per million input tokens. Opus costs $4. Half the price, identical specs. Here is when to use which.
At a glance
| Sonnet 5.5 | Opus 5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input (official) | $2 | $4 |
| Output (official) | $10 | $20 |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 128K |
| Protocols | Messages + Chat | Messages + Chat |
| Release | Sep 28 | Sep 22 |
Beyond the price gap the two are identical on paper. The difference is at the ceiling: Opus handles complex tasks Sonnet cannot finish.
When to use Sonnet 5.5
Sonnet is the default. Most work does not need Opus:
- Daily coding and code review
- Document analysis and technical writing
- General Q&A
- Batch processing
Sonnet handles these. Opus is wasteful here.
When to switch to Opus 5.5
Long-running agent tasks. Sonnet drifts or degrades after several tool-calling rounds. Opus holds course.
Tasks where mistakes are expensive. Production code changes, security reviews, compliance checks. The model cost savings are not worth one wrong call.
Multi-step deep reasoning. Opus catches edge conditions Sonnet misses.
The simplest strategy
Default to Sonnet. Switch up only when it fails. Most of the time, it will not.
Same protocol, same parsing code, same endpoint. Changing models is editing one field.
The math
100 coding tasks per day (5K input + 3K output each)
| Sonnet 5.5 | Opus 5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Daily | $4 | $8 |
| Monthly | $120 | $240 |
A 90% Sonnet 10% Opus split lands between them, getting you 90% of the savings and 10% of the insurance.
On HiAPI
Opus 5.5 runs at $2.02 input on HiAPI, half the official $4. Sonnet 5.5 is coming. Swapping models is one field with one key (see the Claude Code setup guide).
FAQ
How much does Sonnet 5.5 lose to Opus 5.5 on coding?
Most coding tasks are close. The gap shows on long multi-step work with complex context.
Can I mix them?
Yes. Run 90% on Sonnet, 10% on Opus. Same parsing code, separate billing.
Does caching help?
Both support caching. Opus's cache read is 2.5% of input, making long conversations on Opus much cheaper through the cache.
Should I still use Sonnet 4.6?
No. Sonnet 5.5 is 33% cheaper and stronger. The upgrade is a one-field change.
Bottom line
Sonnet 5.5 and Opus 5.5 are identical on specs and 50% apart on price. Default to Sonnet. Escalate to Opus only when it cannot finish. That strategy saves roughly half your monthly model spend.
Related articles
View all articles →-
Comparison
Wan 2.6 Flash vs Wan 2.7: Should You Upgrade?
720P budgets and 1080P fox/car outputs, with audio conditions and actual request tiers disclosed.
5 -
Comparison
Vidu Q4 Preview vs Kling 3.0: Which to Pick?
Vidu Q4 Preview for default audio, 16-second clips and five resolution tiers; Kling 3.0 for first-and-last-frame control. Two same-prompt pairs included.
6 -
Comparison
Replicate Alternative for Image & Video Generation: hiapi vs Replicate (2026)
What changes in your prediction calls, webhooks and billing when you move image and video jobs to hiapi, with a 10-step migration checklist.
9